James Cameron's Avatar

Rurikredwolf · Dec 20, 2009 4:49 AM

The story was predictable as hell, but I did enjoy this movie. I would definently get this, as the effects are great, and the characters are actually somewhat developed instead of your sterotypical heroes.

SapphireSheep · Dec 20, 2009 5:55 AM

I really want to see it. it looks like a beautiful movie. from what i've seen I can say that I absolutely love the creatures and colors.

midget_roxx · Dec 20, 2009 10:59 AM

apparently it's predictable and cliché but very showy. I might see it if I have nothing else to do.

Just for some reviews:
http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/avatar

MrXLink · Dec 20, 2009 12:37 PM

As I know from reviews, the storyline is not that good, but surely not bad.
But the effects seem to be wonderfull and extremely good. I wanna see it for sure wink

Starscream · Dec 20, 2009 1:30 PM

Aside for the evil Colonel who was 100% PURE F***ING BADASS everything about this movie is crap...

~cornys~ · Dec 21, 2009 12:49 AM

I don't think I'll judge it until I see it... I can only hope with all of this hype that it will be though smile

Naegling · Dec 21, 2009 1:13 AM

I saw the movie on friday and i loved it. It is worth the 3 hours and you have to see it in theaters. it is much more enjoyable in a theater with the epic surround sound. it is also in Imax theaters and if you have the chance you should see it there. it is an amazing movie. I gave it an 8.2 in the CGI thread and i'll give it the same here. the dialog was somewhat bland and there were some cliches but it was stil amazing. I deffinetly suggest seeing the movie in a theater if you can.

Namba · Dec 21, 2009 8:52 PM

I'm seeing it Wednsday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DarkMaster · Dec 21, 2009 8:58 PM

I wanna see it again.

Swaffy · Dec 21, 2009 11:12 PM

I heard that it took around 10-12 years to make that movie.

SapphireSheep · Dec 21, 2009 11:16 PM

ohmygod O_o really? I wonder if that's true because that is alot of hard work and time spent on a movie

Starscream · Dec 22, 2009 12:25 AM

I heard that it took around 10-12 years to make that movie.

No he just wrote the script 15 years ago and waited for the tehnology to get good enought in orded to pull of what he wanted...

Too bad that the story sucks *bleep*...

Apoc · Dec 22, 2009 12:32 AM

I have to see this movie

bmah · Dec 22, 2009 7:28 AM

Swaffy wrote:

I heard that it took around 10-12 years to make that movie.

Thoughts, ideas, and planning for 15 years, but actual production was about 4 years.

Naegling · Dec 22, 2009 9:32 PM

Starscream wrote:

I heard that it took around 10-12 years to make that movie.
No he just wrote the script 15 years ago and waited for the tehnology to get good enought in orded to pull of what he wanted...
Too bad that the story sucks *bleep*...

Its not that bad. its predictable but it isnt bad. Its slightly cliche like i said before but i still like it. It took him five or six years to make it i think. He could have come up with a better story in that time but i guess all his time was taken with all the effects.

Andy123 · Dec 27, 2009 8:23 PM

I greatly enjoyed this movie. The new 3d cameras that he created were exelent. I would sugest if you see the movie DO NOT WATCH THE 2D VERSION, even though it makes your eyes hurt. The vivual effects were the best I have ever seen in a movie. The only bad part is the plot was highly predictaple, but it had many great and adventurios side plots. overall I rat this movie 9/10

Namba · Dec 27, 2009 8:26 PM

Andy123 wrote:

I greatly enjoyed this movie. The new 3d cameras that he created were exelent. I would sugest if you see the movie DO NOT WATCH THE 2D VERSION, even though it makes your eyes hurt. The vivual effects were the best I have ever seen in a movie. The only bad part is the plot was highly predictaple, but it had many great and adventurios side plots. overall I rat this movie 9/10

The movie was amazing, but yeah, predictable plot. 9.5 out of 10 for me.

MrXLink · Dec 27, 2009 9:18 PM

Starscream wrote:

I heard that it took around 10-12 years to make that movie.
No he just wrote the script 15 years ago and waited for the tehnology to get good enought in orded to pull of what he wanted...
Too bad that the story sucks *bleep*...

I've seen it today. The graphics are just the best ever made, very cool. Also, how they made up the world, etc. Looks cool, and I really do not know what some guys are talking about when they say that the graphics were good but the story sucks, because that is not true. The only negative point of the story itsself is that it was very predictable. Nothing else. Every little detail was perfect, seriously nothing broken in the 3D and Pandora just looks like an amazing planet. I just started thinking that it would be nice if we had a Leonopteryx here...

I must also say 9.5/10. Every must have seen the most expensive film in the world.

Nightfall · Dec 27, 2009 9:26 PM

^ Awesome! I really wanna go see this.

Starscream · Dec 27, 2009 9:34 PM

The story is Dances with Wolves meets the Last Samurai in Ferngully.

It's predictable, it's clishe, it's seen a million times and it SUCKS!

I don't give a rat's *bleep* for how awesome the effects are a story this lame for a movie that has been hyped as the second coming of cinema is unexceptable!

MrXLink · Dec 27, 2009 9:34 PM

Saphira wrote:

^ Awesome! I really wanna go see this.

You should. It's a great experience.

Starscream · Dec 27, 2009 9:36 PM

P.S. The 3D didn't do anything for me, I forgot about it after first 10 minutes...

So much about that...

Swaffy · Dec 28, 2009 3:55 AM

I sincerely liked the movie. I wouldn't use the word "loved" because I can
only love a human. But I am wishing I could livein a place like that. The
movie was beautiful. And also, it makes me want to hate humans.

Humans seem to not care about the important things ... just machinery
and destruction.

I took this one myself ...

Andy123 · Dec 29, 2009 7:26 PM

Starscream we understand that you did not enjoy the movie, but you don't need to keep flaring it.

Apoc · Dec 29, 2009 9:28 PM

Now I definitely have to go and see this

#26 Dec 20, 2009 4:49 AM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#27 Dec 20, 2009 5:55 AM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#28 Dec 20, 2009 10:59 AM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#29 Dec 20, 2009 12:37 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#30 Dec 20, 2009 1:30 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#31 Dec 21, 2009 12:49 AM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#32 Dec 21, 2009 1:13 AM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#33 Dec 21, 2009 8:52 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#34 Dec 21, 2009 8:58 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#35 Dec 21, 2009 11:12 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#36 Dec 21, 2009 11:16 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#37 Dec 22, 2009 12:25 AM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#38 Dec 22, 2009 12:32 AM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#39 Dec 22, 2009 7:28 AM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#40 Dec 22, 2009 9:32 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#41 Dec 27, 2009 8:23 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#42 Dec 27, 2009 8:26 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#43 Dec 27, 2009 9:18 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#44 Dec 27, 2009 9:26 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#45 Dec 27, 2009 9:34 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#46 Dec 27, 2009 9:34 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#47 Dec 27, 2009 9:36 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#48 Dec 28, 2009 3:55 AM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#49 Dec 29, 2009 7:26 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

#50 Dec 29, 2009 9:28 PM

Re: James Cameron's Avatar

Board footer