So three years?

Spyro Master · Jan 09, 2009 11:47 PM

ok fair enough that seems to hav answered wot i was saying thx bt its a shame they dnt though i would liek to c it once

RedDragonX · Jan 10, 2009 10:52 PM

Well Bmah is pretty right on about that. You see...when Spyro came out over 10 years ago...it was considered revolutionary thanks to its graphics and gaming design...it was very popular and something rather different then what people were seeing. That's one of the many reasons why the game was as successful as it was.

But now...it's a different market...it's much harder to create something original....almost impossible actually. New ideas are rather out there...and recreating something is very very hard to pull off to any effectiveness. The game was built for success during that time.....trying to pull off the same thing again, however, would be like putting a gun to their own heads. It's just not gonna work out.

Spyro Master · Jan 11, 2009 2:46 PM

well they can at least try to anyway i reckon if they kept wiv teh same formula that the old spyro games had then it would appeal to more people as it would still b a classic game bt wiv updated systems kinda like mario is now sort of

RedDragonX · Jan 11, 2009 3:51 PM

That is certainly a possibility for the future...but I'm sure that many other developers have seen why Insomniac let go of it...and then saw the failures after that in the attempt to keep working with it....I'm sure that Sierra is gonna want to stay out of that possibility as long as they own the rights.

If someone does try to pull it off...I don't know....I think it would be more dangerous to do and I'm not sure they would be willing to make that risk.

Spyro Master · Jan 12, 2009 7:43 PM

hmmm fair point there it would b risky bt still it would b good

Jackson117 · Jan 12, 2009 10:59 PM

I can't hold the wait someone make a spyro game NAO

RedDragonX · Jan 12, 2009 11:50 PM

If only it were that easy lol...I much rather they torture us until the release date then this waiting to find out if another game is even going to be made...it kills me....freeze me in time like they were for three years and wake me up lol....maybe something cool will be out by then...

Spyro Master · Jan 31, 2009 11:15 AM

lol good idea frozen in carbonite or woteva bt i would like them to of least of dropped some little hints to get us guessing more

RedDragonX · Feb 01, 2009 4:55 AM

Well unfortunetely I have not seen such hints....just the usual stupid rumors that I disregard.

Jackson117 · Feb 01, 2009 7:57 AM

I believe Krome was doing great until sierra destroyed them to dust

RedDragonX · Feb 02, 2009 4:41 AM

I don't see what that has to do with the topic lol.....but I had mixed feelings about Krome.....I did want to see a change in design and such....but they did have pretty good mechanics.

Spyro Master · Feb 02, 2009 11:04 PM

yeh bt at least soem1s doing something thats all i can say

RedDragonX · Feb 02, 2009 11:18 PM

Spyro Master wrote:

yeh bt at least soem1s doing something thats all i can say

Very true...

Spyro Master · Feb 02, 2009 11:30 PM

well sierra is carrying it on and dotd was ok so it should go all ok

RedDragonX · Feb 02, 2009 11:47 PM

I'm looking forward to the next game....I really think that things will go a little bit up....at least that's just the feeling I get tongue

Jackson117 · Feb 03, 2009 9:10 AM

that's how i got about Godzilla Unleashed....

and it was crap

RedDragonX · Feb 03, 2009 5:05 PM

I didn't try it...anyways let's get this back to the topic that they either didn't age three years in the crystal or the did...wow things got far off here.

Spyro Master · Feb 03, 2009 10:06 PM

yeh bt still spyro related smile i reckon that they were sort of hibernating in the crystal bt then them and everything around them aged as time goes by so inside teh crsytal isnt different time its just them hibernating which ive just thougth of

RedDragonX · Feb 04, 2009 4:18 AM

Spyro Master wrote:

yeh bt still spyro related i reckon that they were sort of hibernating in the crystal bt then them and everything around them aged as time goes by so inside teh crsytal isnt different time its just them hibernating which ive just thougth of

Just were not aging at all simply.....just the art change and everything that Sierra made up in them being older screwed everyone up.

Jackson117 · Feb 04, 2009 7:28 AM

Maybe they didn't age because they never aged in Aliens franchise

Spyro Master · Feb 04, 2009 7:56 PM

?? aliens frnachise im getting confused wots the alien film gt to do wiv it ??? lol

RedDragonX · Feb 04, 2009 9:14 PM

My guess is that it has nothing to do with the Alien movies lol....he was just being wonderfully random as he can be..

Jackson117 · Feb 05, 2009 6:06 AM

do i have to explain in Aliens they never age when they go into a ice Cyrotube.

Now maybe thats the same idea with Spyro,Star trek,HALO,Chucknorris

Spyro Master · Feb 05, 2009 9:09 PM

oh i get it now i tihnk ...............................lol

Trasher258 · Feb 05, 2009 9:20 PM

It reminds me of my physics class where most of the classmates are not paying much attention to vital details and I seem to be the smartest one in the class. I sometimes verify an answer to a problem that seems incorrect by going into depth and seeing that everything is functioning with each other correctly. For Sierra, it's understandable due to the amount of time they had for developing it. It takes awhile to check everything over...or at least most of it. I don't expect perfection.

Oh, and happy birthday Spyro Master! big_smile

#126 Jan 09, 2009 11:47 PM

Re: So three years?

#127 Jan 10, 2009 10:52 PM

Re: So three years?

#128 Jan 11, 2009 2:46 PM

Re: So three years?

#129 Jan 11, 2009 3:51 PM

Re: So three years?

#130 Jan 12, 2009 7:43 PM

Re: So three years?

#131 Jan 12, 2009 10:59 PM

Re: So three years?

#132 Jan 12, 2009 11:50 PM

Re: So three years?

#133 Jan 31, 2009 11:15 AM

Re: So three years?

#134 Feb 01, 2009 4:55 AM

Re: So three years?

#135 Feb 01, 2009 7:57 AM

Re: So three years?

#136 Feb 02, 2009 4:41 AM

Re: So three years?

#137 Feb 02, 2009 11:04 PM

Re: So three years?

#138 Feb 02, 2009 11:18 PM

Re: So three years?

#139 Feb 02, 2009 11:30 PM

Re: So three years?

#140 Feb 02, 2009 11:47 PM

Re: So three years?

#141 Feb 03, 2009 9:10 AM

Re: So three years?

#142 Feb 03, 2009 5:05 PM

Re: So three years?

#143 Feb 03, 2009 10:06 PM

Re: So three years?

#144 Feb 04, 2009 4:18 AM

Re: So three years?

#145 Feb 04, 2009 7:28 AM

Re: So three years?

#146 Feb 04, 2009 7:56 PM

Re: So three years?

#147 Feb 04, 2009 9:14 PM

Re: So three years?

#148 Feb 05, 2009 6:06 AM

Re: So three years?

#149 Feb 05, 2009 9:09 PM

Re: So three years?

#150 Feb 05, 2009 9:20 PM

Re: So three years?

Board footer