Activision Blizzard own Sierra

Fletch_Talon · Aug 01, 2008 8:21 AM

bmah wrote:

You're pretty disciplined, Fletch. Easy to say, but not everyone is like you in that respect.
I've heard of the story where a baby of two Korean couples died from negligence because the parents were too busy playing WoW. WOW.

a guy already responded to that all ill add is the fact that if they werent addicted to WoW itd probably be something else: alcohol/smoking/gambling and thats assuming they werent already

And don't forget that people sell virtual WoW items for hundreds of dollars because many items are rare. WOOOW.

thats illegal, im not saying it doesnt happen but if they get caught then they get in deep stuff... also i think its more common for them to sell/buy gold (also illegal)

Taco Godess: WoW is MMORPG and it eats money. Try Warcraft III instead. It is fantasy strategy with RPG elements and you don't need powerful PC to play it.

WoW doesnt actually require a very powerful computer, especially not by todays standards, the main problem is having a good internet connection so you dont get tonnes of lag

also i dont get the joke of the century, please explain?

Mr.Henky · Aug 01, 2008 8:54 AM

Fletch_Talon wrote:

also i dont get the joke of the century, please explain?

Most are, but your computer has to be pretty high-end for today's games... In other words, you need Core 2 Quad, 4GB RAM and GeForce GTX to play most of today's games. Now you get it?

Fletch_Talon · Aug 01, 2008 9:08 AM

Mr.Henky wrote:

Fletch_Talon wrote:
also i dont get the joke of the century, please explain?
Most are, but your computer has to be pretty high-end for today's games... In other words, you need Core 2 Quad, 4GB RAM and GeForce GTX to play most of today's games. Now you get it?

i understand what the quote means, but i dont understand why its funny... its just true hmm

Mr.Henky · Aug 01, 2008 9:16 AM

Fletch_Talon wrote:

its just true

Oh, really? Then I must be a magician, because I have Athlon 64 X2, 2GB Ram, Radeon HD 2600XT and I can still play ALL of today's games.

Fletch_Talon · Aug 01, 2008 9:30 AM

lets start off by letting you know, that as far as graphics cards etc. go, i dont know whats good or bad, i do however know that 2GB RAM is a fair bit, its only just recently becoming common to see 3 or 4 GB RAM in computers (when you buy them, obviously people will have upgraded their computers themselves)

secondly, i also know that it doesnt necessarily take a "high end" (which despite what you obviously believe does not mean "the absolute best their is") computer to run "all" recent releases, if you want to get the best out of them then youll definitely want a high quality computer

theres nothing wrong with turning down the visual settings on a game, but since a lot of hype in the gaming industry is around graphics, youre missing out a little if youre not running the suggested requirements

Mr.Henky · Aug 01, 2008 9:34 AM

Fletch_Talon wrote:

youre missing out a little if youre not running the suggested requirements

I have mainstream PC. It is enough for me.
Btw, Dual-core CPu is enough for all toady's games, Radeon HD 3870/GeForce 8800GT is enough for all toady's games, 3GB is enough for all toady's games. High-end PC is only for hard-core gamers, which I'm not.

Lancer232 · Aug 01, 2008 12:49 PM

Ok ok, the only reason I said that is because I have a low/mid-end computer for games, I'm very low on RAM and my computer does not take the new DDR2 RAM sticks...I'm still in the 512mb era, but my grandpa (resident computer genius lol) said once he gets a new Motherboard, I get his RAM (over 1GB). But in terms of processors and videocards, I'm good, I have an Intel Celeron (2.5ghz) and a GeForce FX 5500 videocard. A lot of my games work with little problems albiet the frame lag, heck, my Battlefield 2142 game has an FPS of 0.5 Frames due to my RAM! I get an average of 25-30 fps on a game like StarWars Galaxies (Star Wars WoW in a way)...Plus games like Enemy Territory: Quake Wars takes a LOT of resources to play.

Mr.Henky · Aug 01, 2008 1:27 PM

Your CPU and VGA are WAY old.

Fletch_Talon · Aug 01, 2008 11:56 PM

Mr.Henky wrote:

Fletch_Talon wrote:
youre missing out a little if youre not running the suggested requirements
I have mainstream PC. It is enough for me.
Btw, Dual-core CPu is enough for all toady's games, Radeon HD 3870/GeForce 8800GT is enough for all toady's games, 3GB is enough for all toady's games. High-end PC is only for hard-core gamers, which I'm not.

high end to me, and many others i would guess, does not mean you have to have everything maxed out

3GB of RAM is more than most non "hardcore gamers" would have nowadays unless they bought the computer recently

my laptop i bought last year has 1GB of RAM, i could have found one with 2GB probably, but it would have cost me a lot more

nowadays, on the other hand, 2GB of RAM is common, and it goes up to 4GB from what I've seen, but again youll end up paying a fair bit more for it, and non-gamers (and/or animators/artists), arent going to see a need for that extra power

so they end up buying a computer than can run new games, but it still cant run them at full graphics

Mr.Henky · Aug 02, 2008 11:50 AM

Fletch_Talon wrote:

Mr.Henky wrote:
Fletch_Talon wrote:
youre missing out a little if youre not running the suggested requirements
I have mainstream PC. It is enough for me.
Btw, Dual-core CPu is enough for all toady's games, Radeon HD 3870/GeForce 8800GT is enough for all toady's games, 3GB is enough for all toady's games. High-end PC is only for hard-core gamers, which I'm not.
high end to me

This? Are you serious? This is mainstream.

Martial Arts Spyro · Aug 03, 2008 3:22 PM

Activision is the second most trusted publisher today.

Rose · Aug 03, 2008 3:39 PM

I've never heard of them. I don't like playing war games, or pretty much any game where the main characters have guns. At some point I'll try the Ratchet and Clank games since Insomniac made them, but that's it.

Thundersoul · Aug 07, 2008 5:19 AM

Taco Godess wrote:

Mr.Henky wrote:
WarCraft, StarCraft, Diablo... Nothing?
doesn't ring a bell.

Blizzard is a Company known for there Real Time Stratgies or RTS, When I was little I played Starcraft. Most if not all of their games involved Drama and deals with all sides of the stories. they did branch out into RPG or role playing games, Diablo 1-3 being one of them then MMO or Massive multi Online but World of Warcraft is a very dull game like most MMO's. But Activision Blizzard, are you sure your not talking about another company or get your information confused? Bilzzard is known for their RTS And RPG not Adventure games and they are working on 3 titles already (StarCraft II, Diablo III, and WOW Wrath of the Leech King)

Fletch_Talon · Aug 07, 2008 7:49 AM

Thundersoul wrote:

then MMO or Massive multi Online but World of Warcraft is a very dull game like most MMO's.

BZZZZZZT thats your opinion, plenty of people enjoy MMOs and people dont generally enjoy things that are dull, it helps if you dabble into the social side of things since thats what separates mmorpgs from rpgs

But Activision Blizzard, are you sure your not talking about another company or get your information confused? Bilzzard is known for their RTS And RPG not Adventure games and they are working on 3 titles already (StarCraft II, Diablo III, and WOW Wrath of the Leech King)

note the difference

Blizzard
Activision
Activision Blizzard

its now 2 companies merged

also its lich king, though if that was meant as a pun (WoW leeches the life out of dateless uber geeks) then i give it a 7/10

Thundersoul · Aug 07, 2008 9:14 AM

Fletch_Talon wrote:

Thundersoul wrote:
then MMO or Massive multi Online but World of Warcraft is a very dull game like most MMO's.
BZZZZZZT thats your opinion, plenty of people enjoy MMOs and people dont generally enjoy things that are dull, it helps if you dabble into the social side of things since thats what separates mmorpgs from rpgs
But Activision Blizzard, are you sure your not talking about another company or get your information confused? Bilzzard is known for their RTS And RPG not Adventure games and they are working on 3 titles already (StarCraft II, Diablo III, and WOW Wrath of the Leech King)
note the difference
Blizzard
Activision
Activision Blizzard
its now 2 companies merged
also its lich king, though if that was meant as a pun (WoW leeches the life out of dateless uber geeks) then i give it a 7/10

Sorry for the spelling error tongue As for the merged companies I did not hear that and it is my bad. But My saying about WOW still stands. Like EQ, WOW sucks people's life away.

Fletch_Talon · Aug 07, 2008 9:18 AM

Thundersoul wrote:

Sorry for the spelling error As for the merged companies I did not hear that and it is my bad. But My saying about WOW still stands. Like EQ, WOW sucks people's life away.

ive said it before elsewhere, but WoW only sucks away your life if you let it, i play WoW, and i enjoy it, but im quite capable of walking away from it, actually right now my accounts inactive until i feel like playing again, its like gambling, theres nothing actually wrong with it but some people cant control themselves, thats their problem, not the game's

bmah · Aug 07, 2008 3:37 PM

Fletch_Talon wrote:

ive said it before elsewhere, but WoW only sucks away your life if you let it, i play WoW, and i enjoy it, but im quite capable of walking away from it

As I said already, most people aren't capable of walking away from WoW. It really is like a drug. Oh well...

Fletch_Talon · Aug 08, 2008 9:51 AM

bmah wrote:

Fletch_Talon wrote:
ive said it before elsewhere, but WoW only sucks away your life if you let it, i play WoW, and i enjoy it, but im quite capable of walking away from it
As I said already, most people aren't capable of walking away from WoW. It really is like a drug. Oh well...

drugs are chemicals which once inside you affect body and mind and thus cause an addiction you have no control over.

WoW is a video game, the only difference between WoW and most other video games is that it:

a) has no definitive ending
b) allows a constant source of social interaction

if you find yourself addicted to WoW dont try blaming it on the game, you obviously have problems completely unrelated to the game you play

your logic is the same that leads people to blame video games for school shootings, macdonalds for obesity and thats all i can think of at the moment

at the end of the day:
you arent going to kill people because of a game unless youre already a violent mentally unsound person

you arent going to get fat eating macdonalds if you eat it responsibly, like cookies, macdonalds is a sometimes food

and youre not going to find yourself incapable of leaving the computer to have a real life unless you already have problems interacting with people in a social environment or have some other problem with your life that leads you to retreat into a fantasy world

bmah · Aug 08, 2008 3:43 PM

It's an analogy Fletch; stop taking me so literally. I'm just stating more or less the reality of what happens when most people falls in love with WoW. I'm not saying you can't do anything about it, and in no way does my previous post represents my logic or thought processes. But nice attempt at trying to straighten me out.

P.S. I do not play any WoW.

Fletch_Talon · Aug 09, 2008 8:48 AM

bmah wrote:

It's an analogy Fletch; stop taking me so literally. I'm just stating more or less the reality of what happens when most people falls in love with WoW. I'm not saying you can't do anything about it, and in no way does my previous post represents my logic or thought processes. But nice attempt at trying to straighten me out.
P.S. I do not play any WoW.

if you dont mean it, then stop saying it, are you serious? everytime ive said something along the lines of "WoW addiction only affects those who let it" you come along in attempt to correct me with "but its really addictive"

your previous post does express your beliefs (if not your logic and thought process too) which apparently is that, most people that play WoW won't be able to stop (thats pretty much saying "you cant do anything about it"), which I'm sorry to say, is *bleep*, actually im not sorry to say it, cuz it gives the impression that there are fewer weak minded socially inept losers in this world than previously estimated

just because you hear a few stories about parents who let their kids die, or guy who neglects his girlfriend, does not immediately make "most" WoW players addicts

because thats like (and dont take this seriously since its an analogy... actually its a simile)

saying most catholic priests are paedophiles because ive heard of 3-4 cases where one was

thats a good generalisation to make a joke about, but dont be too quick to believe it

bmah · Aug 11, 2008 4:57 PM

Holy crap man, cool it.

Yes, I've stated some extreme examples, but they're just to illustrate that WoW can be serious business to some people. As you said, just a generalization. Sorry if I didn't word things clear enough, but I believe I've clarified myself enough in the last post I made. End of discussion.

#51 Aug 01, 2008 8:21 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#52 Aug 01, 2008 8:54 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#53 Aug 01, 2008 9:08 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#54 Aug 01, 2008 9:16 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#55 Aug 01, 2008 9:30 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#56 Aug 01, 2008 9:34 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#57 Aug 01, 2008 12:49 PM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#58 Aug 01, 2008 1:27 PM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#59 Aug 01, 2008 11:56 PM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#60 Aug 02, 2008 11:50 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#61 Aug 03, 2008 3:22 PM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#62 Aug 03, 2008 3:39 PM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#63 Aug 07, 2008 5:19 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#64 Aug 07, 2008 7:49 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#65 Aug 07, 2008 9:14 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#66 Aug 07, 2008 9:18 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#67 Aug 07, 2008 3:37 PM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#68 Aug 08, 2008 9:51 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#69 Aug 08, 2008 3:43 PM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#70 Aug 09, 2008 8:48 AM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

#71 Aug 11, 2008 4:57 PM

Re: Activision Blizzard own Sierra

Board footer