No, I'm saying that we shouldn't rush the developers and let them take their time, or the next Spyro game will probably be like ETD.

Okay, sorry for not reading your post well enough. Same here.

But this will not be rushed I'm pretty sure....they are not going to come out with anything until at least after this movie comes out...which is at the end of this year...my guess is that we will see anouncements for the next game about two years after DotD came out...but that's just what I think.

T3h0v4llu wrote:

Good thing is that blizzard DOESNT need money. Its good because now they can focus on making good games without turning it into some commercial *bleep*.

That's not how it works. Now they can afford to be lazy, hence why it took them this long to start to make SC2. And like with SC:Ghost, they'll probably take in some smaller studio and put them to work on it.

But, like RDX said, wouldn't happen anyway. I'd rather they stick with ELB as well, there's no telling what would happen when you switch studios, just look at the difference between TEN and DotD, there's a lack of consistency that (hopefully) wouldn't be there if they'd stayed with Krome the whole way through.

Not rushing the game means "lazy"? You probably like rushed games dont you? As ive said before, id rather let them take their time than be playing a game that SUCKS.

Good thing is that blizzard DOESNT need money. Its good because now they can focus on making good games without turning it into some commercial *bleep*.

That's not how it works. Now they can afford to be lazy, hence why it took them this long to start to make SC2. And like with SC:Ghost, they'll probably take in some smaller studio and put them to work on it.

But, like RDX said, wouldn't happen anyway. I'd rather they stick with ELB as well, there's no telling what would happen when you switch studios, just look at the difference between TEN and DotD, there's a lack of consistency that (hopefully) wouldn't be there if they'd stayed with Krome the whole way through.

I can see the new title.....

...The Legend of Cynder: Here ya go fantards!

Hahaha....I'm in a good mood now.

I can see the new title.....

...The Legend of Cynder: Here ya go fantards!

*snicker*

...The Legend of Cynder: Here ya go fantards!

LordCrump10 wrote:

Maybe Blizzard can step in and throw Spyro to one of their well known development studios. No offense to either Krome or ELB, but I'd bet 95% of the gaming world wouldn't have a clue as to who either of these studios were prior to the Legend trilogy. Now that it's done, I'd say there's still probably a good 70% of the gaming world that would STILL not know Krome or ELB. >_>

...Or maybe it will just be what happened with SC:Ghost where the game undergoes studio switches in the company and eventually falls into obscurity....

Yeah, seeing as it's not an entirely proven franchaise, don't expect anything. Blizzard isn't a fan of taking risks, from what I've seen. Kind of sad as they could probably do a good job with it.

Good thing is that blizzard DOESNT need money. Its good because now they can focus on making good games without turning it into some commercial *bleep*.

Maybe Blizzard can step in and throw Spyro to one of their well known development studios. No offense to either Krome or ELB, but I'd bet 95% of the gaming world wouldn't have a clue as to who either of these studios were prior to the Legend trilogy. Now that it's done, I'd say there's still probably a good 70% of the gaming world that would STILL not know Krome or ELB. >_>

...Or maybe it will just be what happened with SC:Ghost where the game undergoes studio switches in the company and eventually falls into obscurity....

Yeah, seeing as it's not an entirely proven franchaise, don't expect anything. Blizzard isn't a fan of taking risks, from what I've seen. Kind of sad as they could probably do a good job with it.