Anyways, if I buy it, it'll be on PS2, since I'm assuming they're not going to release a GameCube version. =P[/sub]

Spyro. wrote:

My only GIANT concern is how much difference there will be between the PS3 and PS2 version. I cannot afford a PS3, hence I am hoping quite
terribly that the graphics seen in screenshots and what not are not much
of a difference than what the PS2 version's will be like. ):
As long as Spyro keeps that bigger structure model and that I can still fly t's all good.

In this game:

Wii graphics = PS2 graphics
Xbox graphics = PS3 graphics

Here is a random WII screenshot which will be the same on the PS2:

http://www.videogameszone.de/?menu=brow … e=1&order=

Don't worry, the Wii/PS2 graphics look just as good as the Xbox/PS3 graphics. I am wondering if there is even a difference between the graphics now.

Ah, thanks man, it's a relief to know that.

My only GIANT concern is how much difference there will be between the PS3 and PS2 version. I cannot afford a PS3, hence I am hoping quite
terribly that the graphics seen in screenshots and what not are not much
of a difference than what the PS2 version's will be like. ):
As long as Spyro keeps that bigger structure model and that I can still fly t's all good.

In this game:

Wii graphics = PS2 graphics
Xbox graphics = PS3 graphics

Here is a random WII screenshot which will be the same on the PS2:

http://www.videogameszone.de/?menu=brow … e=1&order=

Don't worry, the Wii/PS2 graphics look just as good as the Xbox/PS3 graphics. I am wondering if there is even a difference between the graphics now.

Will get for PS3, when it becomes Platinum (Greatest Hits). It's just Singleplayer, so I'll wait for the price cut.

Oh guys, Wii is a next gen console, indeed, but it's hardware it's like... 2 GameCubes in 1.
Wii can't handle the current UE3 Engine, Mark Rein said it...
The Wii is a very good console for it's price, but it could never do something like Killzone 2.
I don't bash anyone just for not having a X360/Wii/PS3, everyone gets what they can, what do matters is if you get the game.

The UE3 engine takes hardware to the limit, and is very poor considering that other game engines like Unity and TGEA can load things like 2 Killzones levels on the Wii...

Example: TGEA has a material system called "Pixel Shader 3.0", and it has a feature called "Relief Mapping" which can make games have a 3d look without using any extra polygons. For UE3, it would take 500,000 polygons to load one side that TGEA could load with 1... That is a HUGE difference.

Unity may not have as good of a shading engine as TGEA or UE3, but it has a coding language that can speed up graphics hardware.

TGEA also has ATLAS terrain (which I hope a Spyro version will be implemented in DotD), and ATLAS let's the game have a unlimitedly amount of environments. It works by storing a section of a level in the hardrive, and once it comes into view, it loads it up while leaving the terrain far away still in the hardrive. To get UE3 to load terrain like that would take a HUGE graphics card.

UE3 may have a good shading system and everything, but they have crude methods to release more advanced ones while other game engines can release them better (even if it is a bit harder).

Wii can hold alot of high intensive graphics, it's just that nobody has tried some more advanced techniques to release them...

Oh guys, Wii is a next gen console, indeed, but it's hardware it's like... 2 GameCubes in 1.
Wii can't handle the current UE3 Engine, Mark Rein said it...
The Wii is a very good console for it's price, but it could never do something like Killzone 2.
I don't bash anyone just for not having a X360/Wii/PS3, everyone gets what they can, what do matters is if you get the game.

I loaded up one of my games on the Wii, and I was able to render 18 different scenes, with 3 shaded effects, while loading 200 textured meshes in each with 5,000 polygons each. I also used 2 sets of dynamic lighting. It took less then 20 seconds to load, and there was NO lag at all...

In english: Think 5 Halo 3 levels.

You see? People don't understand a limit until they try it for themselves...

Sure, the PS3 and Xbox could load twice that much, but you would barely notice the difference.

We have almost hit the highest point in graphics rendering... I would give about 3-4 more console generations before we will stop noticing any difference between those.

It is. Even in the Gamecube era it had better graphics capibility than the PS2.

Lolz, I was searching my question on Google
and you're right, Wii, Gamecube DOES have better graphic quality than PS2....
Wow....never thought about that..0_o