Spyro the Dragon Forums / 3D?

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (cynderfire) — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:59:03 +0000

chelseeea0 wrote:

it would be cool if it was in 3-D and the seats moved with the movements of spyro!

Yeah! I agree!

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (Thundersoul) — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:20:37 +0000

We are talking If here, We don't even know if the movie is even going too reach Theaters, for all we know it will go straight too dvd and blue-ray. I've seen it happen too alot of theater wothy movies

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (Aicebo) — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:53:39 +0000

I can't go if I have to wear glasses to see it.
I need glasses to see things even two feet away.

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (chelseeea0) — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:44:07 +0000

it would be cool if it was in 3-D and the seats moved with the movements of spyro!

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (Nikore) — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:46:49 +0000

they use new glasses for 3D films now, THEY ARE AWESOME XD if u havent seen the new digital 3D, U NEED TO!!! they dont give u a headache like the red/blue glasses xD and it looks real xD my dad forced me to go see Meet The Robinsons with my little bro, and I only liked it because of the 3D xD

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (dragon protector x) — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:18:45 +0000

Those Red Blue Glasses suck...The 3D Effects with Gray galsses in Disney World ROCKED! The Effects of Red, BLue Glasses isnt as good as the Gray ones they used in the ones in Disney World. They should make it 3D fitted with those type of glasses.

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (Martial Arts Spyro) — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:13:07 +0000

You make a excellent point! I don't really care what they do. BUT either way I'm gonna be waiting outside the movie theater at midnight with my cousin waiting to see this movie drinking starbucks so I can stay awake! Besides it's from the producers of Eragon and me and my friend gave it 5 stars! Spyro can get 90 hit combo on the critics and charge them, burn them, freeze them solid, electrocute them, and make an earthquake to make a bunch of giant rocks fall on thier head! I hate critics. I'm sure Spyro does to!

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (Scarabbug) — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:33:23 +0000

To be entirely accurate, Beowulf isnâ€™t a 3D picture, but a Motion Capture Animation (you know that one where they stick people in funny suits covered in ball-shaped sensors and make them act against a green or blue background?) So every single animated image you see in Beowulf was done based on pre-filmed scene involving the actual human actors. It was then ran through 3D programming and â€œanimatedâ€: that's why it looks so real. This technique creates some strikingly realistic animation, but is no good for anaimtions where your characters aren't SUPPOSED to look real (like Toy Story, for example).

3D aniamtion is just animation created on 3D software and made to look... well... three dimensional.

For this reason, the Spyro movie now is unlikely to be using motion capture animation like Beowulf: none of the characters are realistic in nature, so they couldnâ€™t be done via motion capture, unless the producers happen to be in contact with some real live dragons (Iâ€™d love their autographs if they were. Hee!)

That said, though; people can (and sometimes do) use motion capture sometimes in unrealistic films for certain scenes. Heck, if youâ€™re gonna animate ANYTHING you need a source of reference: if you wanna animate a dog walking? Watch a real dog walking. if you wanna animate a dragon walking... well, thatâ€™s a little harder, but you can look at other animals and get a round idea of what would look right on a dragon.

Soo... yeah.

I will now shut up. XD

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (Black Shadow) — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:32:13 +0000

cynderfan wrote:

It is 3-D I saw it on someone's account on DA.

don't rely on that.

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (cynderfan) — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:34:05 +0000

It is 3-D I saw it on someone's account on DA.

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (Epesi) — Thu, 29 May 2008 12:34:38 +0000

Even if it is 3D, I'm guessing they'll play it normally too. 3D would probably only be in select theaters. I think that's how it worked with the latest Harry Potter, but correct me if I'm wrong.

I haven't been to a 3D movie in a long time; I think I'd get used to it quickly, but I'd still prefer to see it without. If I can do both, I probably will.

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (TheManiacOnWheels) — Thu, 29 May 2008 05:31:16 +0000

I've never been fond of 3D movies. I prefer it when it's just...normal.

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (Ace of Spades) — Thu, 29 May 2008 04:41:49 +0000

I hope not, I have lazy eye and the glasses would not work for me.

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (Dark Fury Dragon) — Mon, 12 May 2008 17:08:47 +0000

I just read that! ZOMG I can't wait!!!!!!!! YAY!!!!!!!! *dances*

Re: 3D?

dummy@example.com (Laura-Jane) — Mon, 12 May 2008 15:55:09 +0000

I thought it would be, they wouldn't put '3D' next to the title (because it's fairly obvious it's not a 2D movie), and velvet octopus had it listed as both a CG and 'Real D' movie, meaning it's one of those things-popping-out-of-screen films.