<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://www.spyroforum.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3661&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Spyro the Dragon Forums / Where the Wild Things Are]]></title>
		<link>https://www.spyroforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=3661</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Where the Wild Things Are.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:47:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Where the Wild Things Are]]></title>
			<link>https://www.spyroforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=73522#p73522</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Where the Wild Things Are was a classic book I grew up with and when I heard they were making a movie version I was extremely excited. However, they chose a very adult director to make the movie - Spike Jonze. He tends to do more artsy films - Being John Malkovich, Adaptation, etc. The film has wrapped and cost around $75 million USD. Now they want to scrap it and start over. Why? It was &quot;too edgy&quot;. The film took a somewhat cynical look at childhood. The story is pretty simple - there&#039;s a rebellious boy named Max who after fighting with his mother runs away and winds up in a land of monsters. These monsters are nice enough, though, and make him their king. He learns being a leader is tougher than he thought and learns to forgive his mom. The film shows all this - how hard children/parent relations can be, and also how a world of fantasy can be affected when children stop believing (akin to Peter Pan). I can&#039;t believe they want to start over! This film had the potential to be classic - like other edgy children&#039;s films of the past such as The Dark Crystal and The Neverending Story. In order to make it more marketable (as in McDonald&#039;s toys, candy promotions, spin-offs, etc.) they want to make it more like The Cat in the Hat. Silly, a comedy, colorful and bright. Please, if you remember reading this book make your voice heard about why it shouldn&#039;t be re-shot. It&#039;s not definite that they will do this, yet, so there&#039;s still time to sway them not to. They want to do this so we, the movie-goers, will be more inclined to see it. Let them know we will see an edgier version so a re-shoot does not need to happen.</p><p>If this doesn&#039;t apply to you, you can ignore it. However, if you grew up with Maurice Sendak and this book - do something to stop them from raping it and making it a silly little children&#039;s film. We don&#039;t need another Cat in the Hat or Grinch - we need our childhood done right!</p><p>Share your thoughts.</p><p>More info:</p><p><a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/35768" rel="nofollow">http://www.aintitcool.com/node/35768</a><br /><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386117/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386117/</a><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_the_Wild_Things_Are" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_the_Wild_Things_Are</a><br /><a href="http://hs.facebook.com/group.php?gid=10434307342" rel="nofollow">http://hs.facebook.com/group.php?gid=10434307342</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Spyro)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.spyroforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=73522#p73522</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
