Game is out soon. So this discussed was good, a day one patch still seems a bit crazy but I'm okay with it.

Hope everyone enjoys the game, don't be discouraged by having to upload the patch get the game and enjoy the charming, nostalgic games that made most of us. Spyro fans.

If you are still don't want it that's fine don't get if you don't want it.

Anyway should be fun going to be great.

https://www.ign.com/articles/2018/10/29 … 517d0005f4

You wanted a delay?  You got it, lol.

Activision: "I heard there's some respect for me?"

Every game has patches.  Every single one.  There is no discrimination.  I know what you're saying is that you want to be able to plug in and play, but even if that's the case, the game is 100% going to have a day 1 patch, and probably a few more patches over the next year.  These days, game developers don't stop developing their game until 6-12 months after release at the earliest.  That's not an Activision thing, or a greedy triple A company thing.  It's an every game thing.

The only argument left is if they should release the game.  And like I said before, I expected them to delay it before Summer hit, just because Crash also got delayed, and basically every Activision game that isn't a FPS gets delayed.  But here we are and it seems as though they are trying to hit the launch window and trying to build the plane in the sky.  I know this doesn't put everyone's mind at ease, but at least we know more about the reasons why this is happening the way it is.

I do think a physical copy with all three COMPLETE games will be available at some point.  Be patient.  Be excited.  Be Spyro.

Also, sorry if this was already shared.

https://youtu.be/GlhvOnEFGAE

The thing about that is, a music artist would prefere you to buy the physical cd containing their albums' because they actually do make more money that way. Now Spotify and the record label takes a cut of that money ythe artist gets from the ads you watch listen to. Some of the popular artsit actually still publish cd's still and guess what I get the whole album on the disc no download required in 2018 (get with the times Activision). The reason they allow their music online on these services for you to listen to is because that is where people listen to music online these days and they have to make money somehow. It's different with video games because if any game publisher decides to not release another version of any game for some time... (lets say decades)and there is no other service that provides that game anymore thenat that point it's truly lost. Additonally, to get stright to the point of why it's a bad thing that the game requires a download is the fact that it requires a download. There is no reason that it should, a blue ray disc cold hold atleast 100 GB of space(more than enough to remaster 3 PS1 games.). I can't wait to see how large the patch is if it's like 30 gb (maybe a little mor eor less.) They could had found a way to put that on a disc.

I understand the frustration.  I still think the physical edition people are wanting will exist at some point.  I just don't think it will exist in September.  If it's a problem, then wait.

Spyro3Fan200 wrote:

...once steam, psn, xbox live and Nintendo go offline...

I'm sorry, I just can't ever take people seriously when they say things like this.  To me it's like saying music will be lost once radio, spotify and itunes go offline.

The thing about that is, a music artist would prefere you to buy the physical cd containing their albums' because they actually do make more money that way. Now Spotify and the record label takes a cut of that money ythe artist gets from the ads you watch listen to. Some of the popular artsit actually still publish cd's still and guess what I get the whole album on the disc no download required in 2018 (get with the times Activision). The reason they allow their music online on these services for you to listen to is because that is where people listen to music online these days and they have to make money somehow. It's different with video games because if any game publisher decides to not release another version of any game for some time... (lets say decades)and there is no other service that provides that game anymore thenat that point it's truly lost. Additonally, to get stright to the point of why it's a bad thing that the game requires a download is the fact that it requires a download. There is no reason that it should, a blue ray disc cold hold atleast 100 GB of space(more than enough to remaster 3 PS1 games.). I can't wait to see how large the patch is if it's like 30 gb (maybe a little mor eor less.) They could had found a way to put that on a disc.

...once steam, psn, xbox live and Nintendo go offline...

That's when we stop playing games then I guess, lol.

I'm sorry, I just can't ever take people seriously when they say things like this.  To me it's like saying music will be lost once radio, spotify and itunes go offline.

Rest assured,  there's evidence that suggests this wont be a problem, the Sony Playstation 5 is already rumored and talked about now, and the report is that they are working with AMD for processing, and it would be very similar to the architecture from the PS4, implying that nothing is stopping game libraries from transferring over.  I imagine Microsoft would do the same thing.  Nintendo, for all it glory, is actually the most guilty of double-dipping on game licenses.  So I can't speak for them.  They are typically the ones who are more than happy to charge for the same game 5 times.

http://www.playstationlifestyle.net/201 … 4-library/

"The final bit of evidence comes in the form of the new AMD Ryzen tech that Sony seems to be working with. While not confirmed to be the CPU that Sony will use in their next generation console, if Sony is indeed working with it, it would mean that the PS4 and PS5 architecture are very similar. The PS4 currently uses a modified AMD Jaguar. One of the biggest things preventing the PS4 from backwards compatibility with PS3 games was the leap from the Cell architecture on the PS3, which was a vastly different hardware environment. If PS4 and PS5 are more similar (using the Jaguar and Ryzen CPUs respectively), it would be possible to allow users to carry over their PS4 libraries."

I really hope that console generations will no longer be seen as a finite era where your games are your games and you can't move them around.  If I want to play Wolfenstien 3D, I need not to play it on a old computer running DOS with a CRT monitor and install the game using a floppy disk.  If consoles want us to buy their games, they need to be more convenient than that.  I think a console like the PS5, would really be just a PS4 Pro...  Pro.  It's not a new console, it's just the next step.