<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://www.spyroforum.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=14365&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Spyro the Dragon Forums / Ditch the Stone, Keep the Threat of the Shadow Realm]]></title>
		<link>https://www.spyroforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=14365</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Ditch the Stone, Keep the Threat of the Shadow Realm.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 05:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ditch the Stone, Keep the Threat of the Shadow Realm]]></title>
			<link>https://www.spyroforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=425187#p425187</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve decided that it would have been better to ditch the stone and to focus the Shadow Realms&#039;s reason for existing on Dark Gems. It definitely still won&#039;t help a great deal, but it could have opened up more story opportunities, especially since I see a good chance that if a successor somehow exists, there&#039;ll be tougher enemies that&#039;ll harness the power from the gems. Besides, the stone doesn&#039;t have a deep focus point. It could have been their choice to ditch the second dimension entirely, so they can focus on the Shadow creatures being threats that emerge from &quot;hells&quot; and actually give Spyro a challenge, rather than be in one dimension and just not do any good in general.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (LocoGuy107)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 05:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.spyroforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=425187#p425187</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
