I added on a edit saying i'd move my explanation to the animated movies topic xD guess i forgot to post it

Clock-la: Topic plz kthxbai.

Clock-la wrote:

Latias fan wrote:

Really almost all of the Disney Sequels are like T.V shows. They've got the budget of one, The animation of one, the scale of one. Heck I think the same company or branch who does the Disney channel cartoons made those sequels.

Main exception to this rule is Rescuers Down Under. That *bleep* had scale, great animation and great plot.

Rescuers down under is god awful.

Only disney sequels i like are lion king 2 and cinderella 3

>Not liking Rescuers Down under
>Liking Lion King 2

Also I tried to see Cinderella 3 and man...I can't even get past the opening. It was paced way too fast. That opening song was horrible. I dunno if it gets better but man. I just can't do it.

Ok i can explain

Yes the opaning is way to fast and wtf but honestly affter that you find yourself in a much better place   a camp vut sweet film also i kinda like the opaning song xD its goofy but fun

Lion king2 is ok...its not worthy of the "omg best thing everrrrrrrrr" treatment it gets but it is still ok.

Also rescuers down under i just haaatteeeeeeee it is ugly to look at boring dull, ugly, ugly, ugly, and even more ugly. I hated it like mad

Wich is odd considering the first is one of my top 5 fravorut disney films. I find the second ugly because of how neet it is. It makes the scechyness of the first loose that charme and just looks like *bleep*.

I would merge the off-topic posts with that thread, but the forum won't let me. -__-

Latias fan wrote:

Clock-la wrote:

The second one was just a tv show that got axed during the maxing...

Really almost all of the Disney Sequels are like T.V shows. They've got the budget of one, The animation of one, the scale of one. Heck I think the same company or branch who does the Disney channel cartoons made those sequels.

Main exception to this rule is Rescuers Down Under. That *bleep* had scale, great animation and great plot.

Rescuers down under is god awful.

Only disney sequels i like are lion king 2 and cinderella 3

>Not liking Rescuers Down under
>Liking Lion King 2

Also I tried to see Cinderella 3 and man...I can't even get past the opening. It was paced way too fast. That opening song was horrible. I dunno if it gets better but man. I just can't do it.

Clock-la wrote:

The second one was just a tv show that got axed during the maxing...

Really almost all of the Disney Sequels are like T.V shows. They've got the budget of one, The animation of one, the scale of one. Heck I think the same company or branch who does the Disney channel cartoons made those sequels.

Main exception to this rule is Rescuers Down Under. That *bleep* had scale, great animation and great plot.

Rescuers down under is god awful.

Only disney sequels i like are lion king 2 and cinderella 3

The second one was just a tv show that got axed during the maxing...

Really almost all of the Disney Sequels are like T.V shows. They've got the budget of one, The animation of one, the scale of one. Heck I think the same company or branch who does the Disney channel cartoons made those sequels.

Main exception to this rule is Rescuers Down Under. That *bleep* had scale, great animation and great plot.

Hey, Atlantis is an awesome movie. That bright lady in that weird room
scared me when I was young. Made me shake.

I think pretty much everyone here loves that movie. Myself included. So underrated.

Only flaw I had a real problem with in Atlantis was the villain. HURRRRRR DESTROY PEOPLE SO WE CAN MAKE MORE MONEY HURRRRRRR Its the Pocahontas villain all over again. I hate that *bleep*. Thankfully the rest of the movie makes it up.