I know that some people will argue that there was far too much detail to make the movie more accurate and that is total and complete bull. yes there is a lot of detail but you can leave a few (or in this case quite a bit, since the book is extremely long[in some peoples opinions] and has a ton of detail, but it is mostly fight scenes and major places that they visited.)  minor things out with out changing the movie too much but i mean seriously they left out far too much detail to make the movie any good. The movie wasn't you know so bad that it needed to be completely erased from human and film history, but it was still really bad.

Aa humble farm boy discovers that he possesses a hidden power and finds himself hunted by an evil overlord who once betrayed a noble order of knights charged with the protection of freedom and justice. Along the way he meets a wise old mentor who gives him a powerful sword, encourages the young man to develop his magical talents, helps him save a princess in the warlord's dark fortress, and sacrifices himself to save the boy. The movie ends with an air battle after the bad guys track down the hidden stronghold of the rebellion.

Sound familiar?

there were non-physical posters online, but i don't remember people selling them physically.

woah, mama. and indeed, Spyro is uglier in Skylanders.

>From the producers of Eragon.

Well the movie was bound to be *bleep* anyway.

there were non-physical posters online, but i don't remember people selling them physically.

woah, mama. and indeed, Spyro is uglier in Skylanders.

Hard to imagin.

woah, mama. and indeed, Spyro is uglier in Skylanders.

They stated that it was because they wanted to take the series in a different direction, which turned out to be Skylanders.

So it was either a bad movie because nearly all video game movies suck. Or the already terribad Skylanders. I say we got the worse option.

Fun fact: The one thing /v/ universally agree on is the Playstation Spyro games to be master pieces.