Spyro the Dragon Forums / Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Swaffy) — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:46:47 +0000

Latias fan wrote:

Swaffy wrote:
I want a Spyro game so big, it takes up 3 disks.
Well with the 360 that's no problem. With the PS3 however we get the entire game in one Blu-ray disc.

I know what BD-ROMs are capable of.

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Jackson117) — Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:53:53 +0000

It's so early that a giant itself smashed me into the ground and roared.

But really I was kinda suprised

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (nintendofreak) — Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:34:25 +0000

Too early yes, but considering the IP holder. Not in the least bit surprised.

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Clock-la) — Sat, 25 Feb 2012 18:58:49 +0000

Stormy wrote:

Well, it might have worked. It sold well. Maybe Spyro's name contributed to the first game's success, and they just don't think they need it for future Skylanders games anymore.
But really, shouldn't people who don't like the game be happy that Spyro's not being used in the title anymore? All anyone (including me) did before it came out was complain that he was in it.

I guess so.

But i'd rather the treated him with more respect insted of tossing him out once there done with him TBH.

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Latias fan) — Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:28:41 +0000

Swaffy wrote:

I want a Spyro game so big, it takes up 3 disks.

Well with the 360 that's no problem. With the PS3 however we get the entire game in one Blu-ray disc.

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Swaffy) — Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:39:51 +0000

I want a Spyro game so big, it takes up 3 disks.

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Latias fan) — Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:06:08 +0000

yearofthe wrote:

Latias fan wrote:
Fantards are never satisfied with anything. Jus look at the Final Fantasy fanbase.
FF12: GAMES TOO BIG!!!!
FF13: GAMES TOO LINEAR!!!!!!
FFXIII-2: GAMES TOO BIG!!! !!!!!!!
How can you complain a game being too big? In fact, I wouldn't even mined if Spyro 3 was six times as long (that being around 180 levels & 24 bosses, but hey, a man can dream, can't he?)

idk. The fanbase is retarded that way.

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (yearofthe) — Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:58:29 +0000

Latias fan wrote:

Fantards are never satisfied with anything. Jus look at the Final Fantasy fanbase.
FF12: GAMES TOO BIG!!!!
FF13: GAMES TOO LINEAR!!!!!!
FFXIII-2: GAMES TOO BIG!!! !!!!!!!

How can you complain a game being too big? In fact, I wouldn't even mined if Spyro 3 was six times as long (that being around 180 levels & 24 bosses, but hey, a man can dream, can't he?)

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Latias fan) — Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:56:12 +0000

Fantards are never satisfied with anything. Jus look at the Final Fantasy fanbase.

FF12: GAMES TOO BIG!!!!

FF13: GAMES TOO LINEAR!!!!!!

FFXIII-2: GAMES TOO BIG!!! !!!!!!!

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Stormy) — Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:26:00 +0000

To be fair, it might not be the same individuals complaining about that, but looking at the fanbase's reaction as a collective, it's funny how we're never satisfied with anything. XD Developers must hate us.

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Aura24) — Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:37:53 +0000

Stormy wrote:

Well, it might have worked. It sold well. Maybe Spyro's name contributed to the first game's success, and they just don't think they need it for future Skylanders games anymore.
But really, shouldn't people who don't like the game be happy that Spyro's not being used in the title anymore? All anyone (including me) did before it came out was complain that he was in it.

lol Some fans noticed Spyro's name not being in the title, and after months of complaining about it and with the name finally being out of the title, some fans are complaining about it being gone.

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Stormy) — Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:57:42 +0000

Well, it might have worked. It sold well. Maybe Spyro's name contributed to the first game's success, and they just don't think they need it for future Skylanders games anymore.

But really, shouldn't people who don't like the game be happy that Spyro's not being used in the title anymore? All anyone (including me) did before it came out was complain that he was in it.

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (36IStillLikeSpyro36) — Mon, 20 Feb 2012 04:41:14 +0000

heh, remember when people thought they put Spyro into Skylanders just to make a rather average idea more acceptable, and more easily popularized?

what a silly idea that was.

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (yearofthe) — Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:24:57 +0000

Stormy wrote:

That's true.... There are bound to be new threads about it popping up pretty frequently, though. Guess we could just put them in the Skylanders section we already have.

Yeah, from the looks of the trailer, it looks like 'Spyro' has been taking out of the title. So, there really is no need for a new section. >.>

Re: Skylanders:Giants Too Early?

dummy@example.com (Stormy) — Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:59:11 +0000

That's true.... There are bound to be new threads about it popping up pretty frequently, though. Guess we could just put them in the Skylanders section we already have.