Spyro the Dragon Forums / Why the site was down

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Clock-la) — Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:20:37 +0000

Latias fan wrote:

Clock-la wrote:
Latias fan wrote:
Tell me what IGNorence scored it.
fix
That's was the joke.

I just tought i'd show it to the lil kids who don't understand our sence of...IGNorence

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Latias fan) — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:47:24 +0000

Clock-la wrote:

Latias fan wrote:
Stormy wrote:
Skylanders is actually doing surprisingly well. It's getting good reviews and people generally like it. Heck, I'd probably like it at least a little if I didn't have to spend any money on it.
It's really just the Spyro fandom that thinks it's a completely terrible idea, it seems.
Tell me what IGNorence scored it.
fix

That's was the joke.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Swaffy) — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:43:10 +0000

Well, I hope not. Because then, all of those "2012 believers" will be correct.

God said so Himself that no human being can know when the world will end.
(If you believe in Him, of course, like I do.)

I don't think Skylanders will affect me much. It's the CoD punks who get on
my last nerve. I've been playing Battlefield a lot, and I've been seeing a lot of
Call of Duty fanboys [kids] with gamertags that have immature words such as
"poop" in them. (Yes, I saw a kid yesterday with the gamertag "PoopMaster.")
When MW3 gets released, all of the little kids will finally get off Battlefield
and stop infecting the servers with their annoying gameplay style. No more
dropshotting! No more noobs sitting back the whole game with their sniper rifles.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Clock-la) — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:34:23 +0000

Swaffy wrote:

nintendofreak wrote:
Stormy wrote:
Skylanders is actually doing surprisingly well. It's getting good reviews and people generally like it. Heck, I'd probably like it at least a little if I didn't have to spend any money on it.
It's really just the Spyro fandom that thinks it's a completely terrible idea, it seems.
No kidding about the the fan base the day it started recieving good reviews, quite a few people went to the youtube trailer and spammed the down vote.
But I've enjoying it quite a bit and glad I bought it.
Skylanders was already released? It's out?

yes...thank lord for 1012.

im starting to hope it happens.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Swaffy) — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:39:40 +0000

nintendofreak wrote:

Stormy wrote:
Skylanders is actually doing surprisingly well. It's getting good reviews and people generally like it. Heck, I'd probably like it at least a little if I didn't have to spend any money on it.
It's really just the Spyro fandom that thinks it's a completely terrible idea, it seems.
No kidding about the the fan base the day it started recieving good reviews, quite a few people went to the youtube trailer and spammed the down vote.
But I've enjoying it quite a bit and glad I bought it.

Skylanders was already released? It's out?

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Clock-la) — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:20:43 +0000

Latias fan wrote:

Stormy wrote:
Skylanders is actually doing surprisingly well. It's getting good reviews and people generally like it. Heck, I'd probably like it at least a little if I didn't have to spend any money on it.
It's really just the Spyro fandom that thinks it's a completely terrible idea, it seems.
Tell me what IGNorence scored it.

fix

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (nintendofreak) — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:45:40 +0000

Stormy wrote:

Skylanders is actually doing surprisingly well. It's getting good reviews and people generally like it. Heck, I'd probably like it at least a little if I didn't have to spend any money on it.
It's really just the Spyro fandom that thinks it's a completely terrible idea, it seems.

No kidding about the the fan base the day it started recieving good reviews, quite a few people went to the youtube trailer and spammed the down vote.

But I've enjoying it quite a bit and glad I bought it.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Stormy) — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 04:06:45 +0000

I dunno, I can't find their rating. Look it up if you want to know. They have links to other press ratings, though; the average so far is 9.0.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Latias fan) — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:48:12 +0000

Stormy wrote:

Skylanders is actually doing surprisingly well. It's getting good reviews and people generally like it. Heck, I'd probably like it at least a little if I didn't have to spend any money on it.
It's really just the Spyro fandom that thinks it's a completely terrible idea, it seems.

Tell me what IGN scored it.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Stormy) — Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:16:29 +0000

Skylanders is actually doing surprisingly well. It's getting good reviews and people generally like it. Heck, I'd probably like it at least a little if I didn't have to spend any money on it.

It's really just the Spyro fandom that thinks it's a completely terrible idea, it seems.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Latias fan) — Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:41:10 +0000

riverhippo wrote:

i actually created a Skylanders freeforum gauging interest last month, and no one has registered yet.

G. I wonder why.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Swaffy) — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:02:13 +0000

I doubt this website took 10 minutes to set up.

But we need an admin who can stay active here and keep updating it where
needed, such as those boxes in the SpyroForum picture at the top-left corner.

A website sometimes feels dead if the admin is [visually] inactive.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (riverhippo) — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:16:59 +0000

i actually created a Skylanders freeforum gauging interest last month, and no one has registered yet.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (Stormy) — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:57:04 +0000

Well yeah, it did take about five seconds and just about anyone could do it, but that doesn't negate the fact that I made it first. Or that I'm the mod and none of you are.

Re: Why the site was down

dummy@example.com (riverhippo) — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 06:45:42 +0000

Aceedwin wrote:

Democracy on the internet. Hah.
It doesn't matter, she bagged the site. It is, to a limited extent, hers.
That's my understanding anyway. But I know bugger all about making websites, so maybe I'm wrong.

Pretty sure the site she 'bagged' took her 10 minutes to set up. I could do the same.

No offense Stormy