Spyro the Dragon Forums / Which One is better Halo Or COD

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (RedDragonX) — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:16:49 +0000

Neotyguy40 wrote:

ontels wrote:
Why didn't you like Halo Reach?
Seemed like they were running out of ideas. Everything felt like a redress of the previous games. Not to mention I felt like the multiplayer was sort of unbalanced to give new players a bigger edge than they should have had.
RedDragonX wrote:
Neotyguy40 wrote:
CoD UO > CoD 1 > Halo > Halo 3 > CoD 2 > Halo Reach > CoD 4 > Halo 2 > Black Ops > CoD 5 > MW2
But in my opinion, other than those first four, the rest suck too much anyways.
I agree completely with that statement. UO is the best version that came out and is currently the only online game I currently still play. Well that and Star Trek Online.
You wanna play sometime? What server do you go onto?
I haven't played it for a little while. But I like to snipe with the Nagant.

Sure thing if you want. I play on the Klazyklan server on version 1.4. I don't know if you're running the 1.5 patch and whatnot or if you have both. I'm part of that clan but I spend time on Sack and RD as well.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (Neotyguy40) — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 01:01:04 +0000

ontels wrote:

Why didn't you like Halo Reach?

Seemed like they were running out of ideas. Everything felt like a redress of the previous games. Not to mention I felt like the multiplayer was sort of unbalanced to give new players a bigger edge than they should have had.

RedDragonX wrote:

Neotyguy40 wrote:
CoD UO > CoD 1 > Halo > Halo 3 > CoD 2 > Halo Reach > CoD 4 > Halo 2 > Black Ops > CoD 5 > MW2
But in my opinion, other than those first four, the rest suck too much anyways.
I agree completely with that statement. UO is the best version that came out and is currently the only online game I currently still play. Well that and Star Trek Online.

You wanna play sometime? What server do you go onto?

I haven't played it for a little while. But I like to snipe with the Nagant.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (RedDragonX) — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:11:11 +0000

Neotyguy40 wrote:

CoD UO > CoD 1 > Halo > Halo 3 > CoD 2 > Halo Reach > CoD 4 > Halo 2 > Black Ops > CoD 5 > MW2
But in my opinion, other than those first four, the rest suck too much anyways.

I agree completely with that statement. UO is the best version that came out and is currently the only online game I currently still play. Well that and Star Trek Online.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (Rurikredwolf) — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:11:08 +0000

As much as I hate to admit it, my vote goes to Halo. I actually enjoyed Reach. It was horribly cliche, but it was no less fun. That and I am a sucker for level ups like they have in Reach.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (ontels) — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:18:26 +0000

Why didn't you like Halo Reach?

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (Neotyguy40) — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:41:19 +0000

CoD UO > CoD 1 > Halo > Halo 3 > CoD 2 > Halo Reach > CoD 4 > Halo 2 > Black Ops > CoD 5 > MW2

But in my opinion, other than those first four, the rest suck too much anyways.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (Clock-la) — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:14:30 +0000

Swaffy wrote:

Clock-la wrote:
If it ain't broke don't fix it.
It's broken; they're not fixing it either.

people are buying it still why should they fix it.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (Erza) — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:20:59 +0000

Halo because Rtas 'Vadumee is the bestest. <3

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (Hodges13x) — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:14:40 +0000

Halo has only gotten better and better over time with the exception of ODST. CoD has gotten cheesier and cheesier. Halo allday erryday

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (JazzJackrabbit) — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:53:24 +0000

TPS is where it's at.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (Swaffy) — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:41:53 +0000

Clock-la wrote:

If it ain't broke don't fix it.

It's broken; they're not fixing it either.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (Clock-la) — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:27:55 +0000

Latias fan wrote:

Clock-la wrote:
Latias fan wrote:
Halo, E.T the extraterritorial the game is better than Call of Duty.

ok now your just over reacting here.
Take CoD as disney here
The formula WORKS people flock out to see the disney Princess films, its why don bluth started to fall. so when he made Anastashia WITH the princess formula he made money.
Its the same for CoD people get it already so whats the point in stop making it and try somthing new? there Is'nt the CoD formula is what people like so it's commen sence to stick to it.
When a series gets milked for too long it starts to lose its flavor and gets bland and boring. Its like playing the same game over and over and over again. Unless the company tries to branch out and takes risks into making new games. They'll come up with something actually interesting.
Take the Final Fantasy series, Each game is different then the last. Different plots, Different worlds, Different characters. Its what makes it unique and its how its manage to last this long.
Its not just Call of Duty that recycles the same plot and mechanics. Its every *bleep* FPS game since the beginning. Every FPS game is basically you running around killing randomly placed people on a map then once you reach a checkpoint, You get a cutscene then its right back to the map to kill more enemies. There's no variety in the enemies, All the maps are pretty much rehashes of another area in the game only with palette swaps,The A.I is beyond retarded and poorly done, And the plot for each FPS game is pretty much the same. A countries at war....that's pretty much it for plot, Enjoy your 60 dollar rehash of another possibly better FPS game you *********.

Just as I said.

The princess formula

she makes cash lets keep this up.

well this is working out grand.

thus we add a few more to the table...

and the cycle carrys on. CoD's repeating itself because its what people what. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

If a formula works for anything then its bound that the formula will be kept, also that said how canm you REALY develop FPS games? there is'nt mutch you can do with them now.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (JazzJackrabbit) — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:03:34 +0000

I don't always play first person shooters.
But when I do, I prefer Halo.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (Swaffy) — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:31:44 +0000

Here's my take, I don't mean to start a flame war:

▼Hidden text

Call of Duty:
- Milked dry, and still being milked.
- Uses the idea of nukes and other giant weapons way too often.
- The same general game engine in every game since CoD 2.
- Maschinenpistole 40 has not changed at all, including its texture and animations.
- Graphics have only been sharpened, not improved.
- Animations are low quality, and the animation system has been the same
for most of the CoD games.
- All guns are low poly.
- The gun sounds sound way too fake and computer-generated.
- It uses too many famous people for its voiceovers.
- Has way too many glitches; most are annoying to deal with.
- The server system is highly unreliable and annoying.
- The people who play the game are a lot more rude than in Halo.
- Everyone gets mad when playing its multiplayer [it's true].
- The spawning system is worse than Halo's.
- The hit detection system is a bit glitchy. Halo's isn't glitchy at all.
- Perks are a bad idea in my perspective.
- Maps are very small, which is a huge no-no in my world.
- Level design is not very good compared to Halo.

Halo:
- Every game is unique and different in its own way, while keeping the old Halo feel.
- Campaigns are all different with their own style and feel.
- The guns stay generally the same, but that is because the Halo games
followed the books. The Halo games actually showed the advances in
technology quite well, disregarding the Equipment things in Halo Reach.
Because Halo Reach happens before all of the other games [regarding its
campaign story], its weapons don't look as advanced as the newer guns
from the later storylines.
- Animations are acceptable, but fit the strength of the spartans. The recoil a
gun makes also matches the type of gun it is; larger guns such as the Sniper
Rifle show more recoil in its animations than, say, a DMR or Battle Rifle.
- Weapons are mid to high poly in Halo 3 and Reach
- Sounds make the alien worlds feel much more relaistic and makes a lot of
the human guns seem real.
- There are a lot less glitches. And the glitches that do exist are a lot more
fun to do than the annoying ones in CoD.
- A gun melee is much more awesome than the 0.2 second knife slash seen in CoD.
- Particle effects are higher in detail and awe.
- Players can drive vehicles.
- There is much better character development in the campaign storylines.
- Multiplayer may be monotonous at times, but not as much as CoD's multiplayer.
- The multiplayer spawning system is a bit better.
- The hit detection system is stronger and more reliable.
- Texture work is a lot more accurate and looks like Bungie actually cares
about the work they're doing.

Re: Which One is better Halo Or COD

dummy@example.com (RedDragonX) — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:56:56 +0000

I'll take Call of Duty but only because of my love for World War 2. Call of Duty past installment #2 is horrible, but I still play the originals online and have a blast with others. Halo is fun to, just don't play it that much.