Same as the Daewoo USAS-12. Both shotguns can weild a 20-round drum
magazine and have full-auto fire. The upside of an AA-12 is that it can fire
12-guage explosive rounds [FRAG-12].

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/v/cQYp9fOJ9VI&tracker=False[/youtube]

His arms must feel like rubber after that.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/v/cQYp9fOJ9VI&tracker=False[/youtube]

My friend has owned shotguns [including a bolt-action shotgun], rifles,
and even a CAR-15. He told me that rifles have larger kick-back over
shotguns for the 5.56 and 7.62 caliber rifles. Rifles put more hurt into your
shoulder. I'm not sure about 8-guage and 10-guage shotguns, though.
Those are usually for military use only since they're so powerful.

This is my input on the [on-subject] subject:

- For the real world, my target would usually be at a distance [no matter
what type of target it is]. I would also be using the gun I love so much, the
M14 or M1A rifle. I am a fan of bolt-action and semi-automatic. If I was in
a military reated small arms fight, a three shot burst fire mode would be a
bit too much for me to feel comfortable with. And sometimes, depending
on the distance from my gun to the intended target, semi-automatic would
be a bit too slow. So I would go with a two-shot burst weapon. I also don't
like shotguns at all, but that's a different discussion.

- For video games, I still like realism. I just got finished playing a game
called Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising. The game is very realistic,
down to the size of the battlefield and the amount of damage a soldier
takes on different parts of his body. While playing that game, I found
myself using semi-automatic fire mode the entire time. I don't like Halo
much anymore, as Halo: Reach pretty much made me lose interest in the
series.

Battlefield: Bad Company 2 has a gun called the AN-94, which fires a two-
shot burst. Though it is an abnormal fire mode for a weapon, it is very ...
versatile when it comes to small arms combat. It puts out just enough
bullets per burst for close range combat, and enough accuracy for longer
range combat.

[/disregardsRulesDebate]

Yes, I am a person who generally makes very long posts.

In the really few FPS that i play i prefer the automatic.

Pretty much that for me as well, although I do use snipers from a distance for spammers.

If you have problems with it then PM SR and ask him to change things, or I can tell him for you myself.

Not true, everyone breaks the rules. Mostly between Clock-la and her Yaoish/swearing stuff, Swaffy and his religious preaching, the new guy and his constant improper english, and me for sarcastically trolling everyone at the same time.

For example ^

And besides, 2 syllables with a single vowel.

Well, I'm more or less referring to topics of discussion. I'm admittedly biased in the fact that guns do not interest me but I find politics more interesting to discuss - yet that's a no-man's land (see previous post for more details). That's sort of my hunch.

Yeah, but you know that even mods need a wake up call every so often? There's such thing as a preferential lean that might allow a bypass/bending of rules, especially if said mod supports the topic. At the very least I'd like some sort of explanation to this apparent irony. Neotyguy's post didn't really address this, but rather discussed other unrelated rules.

@any mod: please PM me if you have an explanation, or -gasp- perhaps even make amendments to the rules if explanation does not suffice!

don't want to derail, but want to let people aware

moving along now...

I wonder why there are so many gun fanatics on this site. Other than being an area of interest not everyone shares, it's ironic that we make forum rules to stress a family-oriented atmosphere - and then you see numerous posts and threads on guns. Despite the fact that it's a hobby for people here and not with malicious intent, I always get a little disturbed at how liberal you guys talk about guns, and try to maintain a supposed family-friendly site at the same time.

I sort of have to pick a bone on you guys for implying that guns (and their usage/firepower) are more acceptable to talk about than politics (or even religion on a peaceful assumption). True, one might argue that the latter two topics I've listed are prone to "heated debate", but gun topics have a negative influence in a different way, namely influencing younger children (no age limit on site). Even if that's not the case now, it just goes against site principles that people so strongly defend on this site.

Not true, everyone breaks the rules. Mostly between Clock-la and her Yaoish/swearing stuff, Swaffy and his religious preaching, the new guy and his constant improper english, and me for sarcastically trolling everyone at the same time.

For example ^

And besides, 2 syllables with a single vowel.

I sort of have to pick a bone on you guys for implying that guns (and their usage/firepower) are more acceptable to talk about than politics (or even religion on a peaceful assumption). True, one might argue that the latter two topics I've listed are prone to "heated debate", but gun topics have a negative influence in a different way, namely influencing younger children (no age limit on site). Even if that's not the case now, it just goes against site principles that people so strongly defend on this site.